Continuing Coverage: Richard Scrushy/Don Siegelman

First filed 3:19 a.m. 08/09

Update :Scrushy Appeal to Get Oral Argument

A three-judge panel at the U.S. 11th Circuit Court of Appeals in Atlanta last week rejected a time-sensitive motion by attorneys for Richard Scrushy. However, the panel directed the clerk to schedule the appeal for oral argument. A former judge says that's significant.

Top Headlines

Originally published 10:40 a.m. - 7/20

Scrushy Attorneys Reply to Government 11th Circuit Response; Scrushy in Beaumont, TX

Defense attorneys say the "Government continues to defend the district court's inexplicable refusal even to obtain and preserve ...critical computer evidence..."

Government Responds to Scrushy 11th Circuit Motion

Saying the granting of Scrushy's motion to the 11th Circuit "would eviscerate the government's ability to prosecute any criminal defendant as well as the public's confidence in the criminal justice system," the government has filed its response to the 11th Circuit motion which asked for subpoenas to preserve evidence related to the question of alleged juror e-mails.

Top HeadlinesMore>>
Why No Audit in the Middle District of Alabama - Scrushy/Carmichael Jury Challenges Identify Problems
Why No Audit in the Middle District of Alabama - Scrushy/Carmichael Jury Challenges Identify Problems
Federal District Judge Myron Thompson recommended in a December opinion that a "complete audit" be conducted by the Amdinistrative Office of Courts in Washington, D.C. on the jury-selection system in the Middle District of Alabama. There will be no audit, the question now is why?More >>
Attorney Says 25 Years for Scrushy "Ridiculous"
Attorney Says 25 Years for Scrushy "Ridiculous"
An attorney for Richard Scrushy says his client shouldn't be facing the sentence of 25 years the government is asking.More >>
Lawyer Objects to Subpoena of Boat Captain: Judge Says Come Anyway
Lawyer Objects to Subpoena of Boat Captain for Scrushy Sentencing
A lawyer for Bill Kurtz, the boat captain for Richard Scrushy's yacht the Chez Soiree, on which Mr. Scrushy took a trip up an intercoastal waterway to Miami during a trip to Florida, has moved for a Motion to Quash a subpoena to have his client present during Scrushy's sentencing next Tuesday. More >>
Siegelman Filing Says Recommendations "Draconian" a "Life Sentence"
Siegelman Filing Says Recommendations "Draconian" a "Life Sentence"
Sentencing attorney for former Governor Don Siegelman, Susan James, filed documents in federal court last week outlining Siegelman's objections to the probation officer's presentencing report and says a sentence according to the guideline range would be "draconian." More >>
Scrushy Attorney Letters Outline Objections to Draft Presentence Investigation Report
Scrushy Attorney Letters Outline Objections to Draft Presentence Investigation Report
In letters made part of the court record Scrushy attorneys outline objections to the draft Presentence Report (PSR) issued in April by the probation officer. After presentation of defense views of the trial testimony, wsfa.com has provided an interspersing of government and Scrushy objections to the draft Presentence Investigation Report.More >>
Scrushy Motion Calls for No Prison Time and Outlines Good Works
Scrushy Motion Calls for No Prison Time and Outlines Good Works
Attorneys for Richard Scrushy say he should not be sentenced to prison and say contributions to former Gov. Siegelman's lottery foundation "were made for legitimate political purposes." They also outline Scrushy's life, philanthropy and good works as reasons he should not serve time following last year's conviction on bribery, conspiracy and mail fraud charges.More >>
First on WSFA.com Original filed 9:32 p.m. 05/25
Government Outlines Requested Sentence for Scrushy
Government Outlines Requested Sentence for Scrushy
The government has filed its sentencing memorandum with regard to businessman Richard Scrushy outlining the sentence it believes appropriate for Scrushy as a result of his conviction on bribery, conspiracy and mail fraud charges in June 2006.More >>
First on WSFA.COM original filed 9:22 p.m. 05/25
Update: Government Seeks 30 Years in Prison for Former Governor; Siegelman Asks Questions
Update: Government Seeks 30 Years in Prison for Former Governor; Siegelman Asks Questions
Government attorneys have filed their sentencing memorandum in the corruption case of former Governor Don Siegelman and "The government asserts that Defendant Siegelman is deserving of and should receive a sentence of thirty years for the criminal conduct for which he was convicted..." The former governor had a few questions himself.More >>
Government Outlines Reasons Scrushy/Siegelman Sentences Should Depart from Guidelines
Government Outlines Reasons Scrushy/Siegelman Sentences Should Depart from Guidelines
Attorneys for the government along with their sentencing memoranda filed May 25, 2007 concerning former Gov. Don Siegelman and businessman Richard Scrushy also filed motions with the court outlining why those sentences should fall above the range of the advisory sentencing guidelines.More >>
Siegelman/Scrushy Case Raised during Gonzales Hearings on Capitol Hill
Siegelman/Scrushy Case Raised during Gonzales Hearings on Capitol Hill
Congressman Artur Davis asked Attorney General Alberto Gonzales about matters related to the Siegelman/Scrushy trial at a recent hearing on Capitol Hill. The question related to the juror misconduct issue.More >>
WSFA Exclusive
Siegelman Visits Probation Officer - Attorneys Oppose Government Recommendations
Siegelman Visits Probation Officer - Attorneys Oppose Government Recommendations
WSFA EXCLUSIVE -- The meeting with the probation office lasted approximately three hours Monday afternoon and WSFA was the only news organization on hand to talk to the former governor and his attorneys in person immediately following the meeting.More >>
District Judge Blasts Scrushy Filing on Lack of Jurisdiction: Orders Clerk to Unseal Motion to Recuse
District Judge Blasts Scrushy Filing on Lack of Jurisdiction: Orders Clerk to Unseal Motion to Recuse
Richard Scrushy/WSFA
Chief District Judge Mark Fuller is apparently not amused at recent court filings by Scrushy attorney Jim Parkman. The judge also unsealed in part the much discussed Motion to Recuse.More >>
Judge Modifies Scrushy Conditions of Release
Judge Modifies Scrushy Conditions of Release
Scrushy in Montgomery 4-30/WSFA
Chief District Mark Fuller is modifying Richard Scrushy's conditions of release. While Judge Fuller affirmed the order of Magistrate Judge Coody in part he set out modifications to Scrushy's terms of release. The judge is making them more stringent.More >>
Scrushy Motion to Recuse Finally Unsealed; Points to Judge's 'Substantial Income' from U.S. Government Contracts
Scrushy Motion to Recuse Finally Unsealed; Points to Judge's 'Substantial Income' from U.S. Government Contracts
Scrushy attorney Jim Parkman's motion asking Chief District Judge Mark Fuller recuse himself from the case was unsealed in part by the judge on Monday. The previously sealed order, which was asked at first by Mr. Parkman to be filed under seal and which according to Judge Fuller was not in compliance with applicable standards, lays out a litany of facts related primarily to Chief District Judge Mark Fuller's involvement with Doss Aviation.More >>
Judge Denies Scrushy's Motion to Recuse
Judge Denies Scrushy's Motion to Recuse
Lost in all the hubbub over the setting of a sentencing date for Richard Scrushy and former Governor Don Siegelman was Judge Fuller's order denying Mr. Parkman's motion for Judge Fuller to recuse himself from the case. We learned from the judge more about what the sealed motion that had generated endless speculation was seeking.More >>
Attorney Argues Federal District Courts Have No Jurisdiction Over Scrushy Case
Attorney Argues Federal District Courts Have No Jurisdiction Over Scrushy Case
Chief District Judge Mark Fuller has unsealed a motion from Scrushy attorney Jim Parkman which questions the jurisdiction of federal district courts and asks that Scrushy's case be dismissed. More >>
Original story posted 8:54 a.m.
Evening Update: Federal Judge Orders Government to Respond to Scrushy Motion
Evening Update: Federal Judge Orders Government to Respond to Scrushy Motion
District Judge Mark Fuller has ordered the government to "show cause in writing on or before January 19, 2007" as to why the motion filed by Richard Scrushy's defense team asking for reconsideration of Fuller's denial of a new trial "should not be granted." Attorney Vince Kilborn and former Governor Don Siegelman weigh in on the matter with wsfa.com.More >>
Sentencing Date Set for Former Governor Don Siegelman and Richard Scrushy
Sentencing Date Set for Former Governor Don Siegelman
Chief District Judge Mark Fuller has set a sentencing date for former Gov. Don Siegelman and former HealthSouth CEO Richard Scrushy. The former governor says he's ready and the former HealthSouth CEO says his faith will see him through.More >>
First on WSFA.com, First Reported 10 :00 a.m. 12/13
No New Trial For Scrushy or Siegelman
No New Trial For Scrushy or Siegelman
Federal District Judge Mark Fuller has now denied the request of former Governor Don Siegelman and businessman Richard Scrushy for a new trial. Judge Fuller says he will not set a sentencing date until the issues related to the challenges to the composition of the jury pool are resolved.More >>
Attorney Files to Unseal Two Motions; Judge Denies Extension of Travel Boundaries for Scrushy
Attorney Files to Unseal Two Motions; Judge Denies Extension of Travel Boundaries for Scrushy
The second recent motion in the case involving Richard Scrushy in the federal court in Montgomery may soon be unsealed. The motion which we know from the court docket and public filings concerns a question of jurisdiction, also under seal is a reply to the government's bond revocation appeal of Judge Coody's ruling. More >>
Final Judgment Order Issued in Scrushy/SEC Case
Final Judgment Order Issued in Scrushy/SEC Case
A Final Judgement Order has been rendered in the Securities and Exchange Commission case against businessman Richard Scrushy and according to the order Scrushy "consented to entry of this Final Judgment without admintting or denying allegations of the Complaint (except to jurisdiction); waived findings of fact and conclusions of law, and waived any right to appeal from this Final Judgment."More >>
Update with Clarification: Judge in Montgomery Scrushy Case Seeks to Set the Record Straight:
Judge in Montgomery Scrushy Case Seeks to Set the Record Straight
Federal judges don't talk to the media about cases before them, but Chief District Judge Mark Fuller spoke out late Friday in one of the ways federal judges do talk. He issued an order seeking to clear up any confusion related to recent court filings in the Scrushy case.More >>
First on WSFA 12 News: originally posted 10:13 a.m.
Scrushy May End Up Under Home Confinement
Scrushy May End Up Under Home Confinement
Businessman Richard Scrushy may be headed to home confinement. There was a petition for a summons from his pobation officer filed with the court that says Scrushy appears to have violated the instructions of the probation officer on a recent trip to Disney World. The government has filed a motion asking for revocationn or modification of conditions of release.More >>
Court Pleading Says Scrushy Not a Flight Risk: "One Mistake" and "Miscommunication"
Court Pleading Says Scrushy Not a Flight Risk
Are Richard Scrushy's current legal problems a self-inflicted, non-mortal wound? Prosecutors would argue Scrushy's recent troubles brought about by an alleged violation of his terms of release on a recent family trip to Disney World are, as usual, self-inflicted. But attorneys for the formerly high-flying businessman argue in a court document that the government's theory about Scrushy testing the waters for an eventual flee attempt are all wet. More >>
Another Purported E-mail Arrives in Scrushy Attorneys' Mailboxes; Supplemental Motion Filed
Another Purported E-mail Arrives in Scrushy Attorneys' Mailboxes; Supplemental Motion Filed
About right now Chief District Judge Mark Fuller is probably reaching for his Advil bottle. The e-mail fairy has struck again sending another purported e-mail to attorneys for businessman Richard Scrushy who then filed another supplemental motion asking for a new trial or at least an evidentiary hearing.More >>
Scrushy to File Appeal on Partial Judgment Order Related to HealthSouth Securities Litigation
Scrushy to File Appeal on Partial Judgment Order Related to HealthSouth Securities Litigation
According to documents filed in federal court this week, former HealthSouth CEO Richard Scrushy has formally given notice that he will appeal Judge Karon Bowdre's Partial Final Judgment and Order of Dismissal entered Jan. 11, 2007 in the HealthSouth Corporation Securities Litigation.More >>
Judge Orders Arguments Via Phone on Scrushy Jury Challenge
Judge Orders Arguments Via Phone on Scrushy Jury Challenge
Magistrate Judge Charles S. Coody has ordered a telephone conference and oral arguments related to the jury challenge filed in the case of former Governor Don Siegelman and businessman Richard Scrushy for Feb. 6, 2007.More >>
Originally Filed 9:27 p.m. Nov. 29, 2006
Scrushy Attorneys Ask to Supplement Court Record: What did Juror Possibly Read?
Scrushy Attorneys Ask to Supplement Court Record: Scrushy Attorneys Ask to Supplement Court Record: What did Juror Possibly Read?
Attorneys for Richard Scrushy have filed a motion to supplement the record in the corruption case specifically as it relates to the issue of jury exposure to extrinsic evidence.More >>
Scrushy/Siegelman Attorneys Receive more E-mails: Strong Difference of Opinion Between Government and Defense
Scrushy/Siegelman Attorneys Receive more E-mails: Strong Difference of Opinion Between Government and Defense
It never seems to end - the corruption case involving former Alabama Governor Don Siegelman, businessman Richard Scrushy and the case of the "mysterious" or some would say "manufactured" e-mails. More >>
Government, Scrushy Attorneys File Motions Requested by Magistrate Judge
Government, Scrushy Attorneys File Motions Requested by Magistrate Judge
The back and forth between defense and government attorneys in filings continues as Judge Coody now has what he needs in his hands to make a recommendation to Chief District Judge Mark Fuller on the jury composition challenge which has been on hold since before the start of the corruption trial involving Don Siegelman and Richard Scrushy.More >>
Update (2/9): Judge Gives Parties Feb. 14 Deadline for Scrushy Jury Challenge Submissions
Update (2/9): Judge Gives Parties Feb. 14 Deadline for Scrushy Jury Challenge Submissions
There is little doubt that there have been problems in the past and some present day problems in the Middle District of Alabama in relation to the way jury pools are selected. That admission has been made in opinions issued in prior and current cases.More >>
Government Files Response to Scrushy/Siegelman Motions; Scrushy Attorney Responds
Government Files Response to Scrushy/Siegelman Motions
Government attorneys have filed their response to late December motions by attorneys for Richard Scrushy and former Governor Don Siegelman. Scrushy senior attorney Art Leach asks the government a basic question in reply.More >>
main update Dec.3, 9 p.m. Original story 8 p.m. Dec. 1, 2006
Prosecutors Say Scrushy/Siegelman Should Not Get New Trial: Scrushy Attorney Says the Constitution Matters
Prosecutors Say Scrushy/Siegelman Should Not Get New Trial: Scrushy Attorney Says the Constitution Matters
Government attorneys say the action of the jurors was "harmless." Scrushy senior attorney Art Leach says, "The government does not address the Court's failure to gather the evidence that could prove their theory of the case." More >>
Courtroom Chronicles Now in Official Record of Scrushy/Siegelman Trial; Judge Grants Request to Supplement Record
Courtroom Chronicles Now in Official Record of Scrushy/Siegelman Trial; Judge Grants Request to Supplement Record
Well, well, well. As much as we try not to be part of the news it now appears WSFA's Courtroom Chronicles has become part of the official court record in the Siegelman/Scrushy corruption trial. Early Friday afternoon Judge Fuller granted the motion to supplement the record in the case.More >>
Judge Finds Limited Extrinsic or Extraneous Information Made its Way to Scrushy/Siegelman Jury
Judge Finds Limited Extrinsic or Extraneous Information Made its Way to Scrushy/Siegelman Jury
Judge Mark Fuller issued an order Monday saying that there was "credible evidence which establishes that during deliberations some of the jurors were exposed to ...extrinsic or extraneous evidence."More >>
Differing Memories of Jury Deliberations during Scrushy/Siegelman Trial
Differing Memories of Jury Deliberations during Scrushy/Siegelman Trial
Was extraneous information introduced into the jury process of the Siegelman/Scrushy government corruption trial? Judge Mark Fuller held a hearing on that and on the possibility of other outside influences on the jury on Friday, Nov. 17, 2006. There were differing opinions inside and outside the courtroom.More >>
Scrushy Team Files Reply to Government
Scrushy Team Files Reply to Government
MONTGOMERY, Ala. Oct. 20, 2006 -- Attorneys for Richard Scrushy have filed a rreply to the governments response to the joint Siegelman/Scrushy Motion for New Trial previously filed. " In its response,More >>
Cumberland School of Law Dean Says Scrushy/Siegelman Hearing "a Disciplinary Matter"
Cumberland School of Law Dean Says Hearing a Disciplinary Matter
Judge John L. Carroll, a former magistrate judge in the Middle District of Alabama and currently dean of the Cumberland School of Law at Samford University, says the hearing called by District Judge Mark Fuller in the post-trial phase of the corruption case involving former Governor Don Siegelman and businessman Richard Scrushy is "really a disciplinary issue" and "doesn't have an effect on the underlying claims" concerning the facts in the government corruption trial case.More >>

Continuing Coverage: Richard Scrushy/Don SiegelmanContinuing Coverage: Richard Scrushy/Don SiegelmanMore>>
Judge Orders Tuesday Hearing on Possible Contact with Juror in Siegelman-Scrushy Case
Judge Orders Tuesday Hearing on Possible Contact with Juror in Siegelman-Scrushy Case
Judge Mark Fuller has ordered an evidentiary hearing "on issues relating to possible post-trial contact with Juror #5" in the post-verdict phase of the government corruption trial involving former Governor Don Siegelman and businessman Richard Scrushy. Discuss this story. Take a poll.More >>
Judge Pushes Hard in Corruption-Trial Hearing on Possible Contact with Juror
Judge Pushes Hard in Corruption-Trial Hearing on Possible Contact with Juror
Judge Mark Fuller started the day off with a shot across the bow of all attorneys and left no doubt who was in charge of the courtroom during Tuesday's hearing into possible contact with a juror in the post-trial phase of the Siegelman/Scrushy government corruption trial. More >>
Original Story 1:54 a.m-12/2/2006
Scrushy Brief Focuses on Possible Future 11th Circuit Appeal: Calls Judge's Inquiry 'Insufficient'
Scrushy Brief Focuses on Possible Future 11th Circuit Appeal: Calls Judge's Inquiry 'Insufficient'
Attorneys for Richard Scrushy, in what appears to be preparation for eventual appeal to the
11th Circuit, say federal District Judge Mark Fuller's inquiry into the possible introduction of extrinsic evidence into the jury process was "insufficient to explore the entire picture of the jury's exposure." More >>
Original Filed 4:42 p.m./12/01/2006
Siegelman Brief Says Jurors' Conduct Warrants a New Trial
Siegelman Brief Says Jurors' Conduct Warrants a New Trial
In compliance with Judge Mark Fuller's order to file final briefs regarding the exposure of jurors to extrinsic information during their service as jurors in the corruption trial involving former Governor Don Siegelman and businessman Richard Scrushy by 5 p.m. today, attorneys for the former governor say the conduct in particular of jurors 7 and 40 warrant a new trial for their client.More >>
Original story published 3:42 p.m
Siegelman Lawyers Say Government Filing "Smacks of Desperation"
Siegelman Lawyers Say Government Filing "Smacks of Desperation"
"The Government's shrill Response to the Defendants' Joint Motion for New Trial smacks of desperation. Rather than encouraging the Court to conduct an investigation to ensure that the jury's verdict is not tainted, the Government attacks the Defendants and their counsel."More >>
First Story originally posted 8:30 p.m. - 10/13
Government Questions Attorneys' Integrity and Calls Jury Misconduct Allegations 'Bombastic' in Siegelman, Scrushy Case
Government Questions Attorneys' Integrity and Calls Jury Misconduct Allegations 'Bombastic' in Siegelman, Scrushy Case
Acting U.S. Attorney Louis Franklin/WSFA
Siegelman attorney David McDonald told wsfa.com if the government opposed his emergency preservation order "I'm going to blow it up, frame it, and hang it on my wall." It looks like Mr. McDonald should get to work on his home decorating project. For his part, Richard Scrushy tells wsfa.com among other things that the government said "a lot of things that are not true and a lot of the facts are twisted."More >>
Original Story Published 10:11 a.m. - October 11, 2006
Siegelman Attorneys Allege Further Juror Misconduct in Supplemental Motion
Siegelman Attorneys Allege Further Juror Misconduct in Supplemental Motion
Attorneys for former Governor Don Siegelman have filed a supplemental motion alleging further juror misconduct. In an extended interview with wsfa.com, former Governor Don Siegelman says there's no way jurors misunderstood the judge's daily instructions not to communicate with anyone about the case outside the jury room and outside the presence of all 12 jurors.More >>
Originally filed 5 p.m. 09/25/2006
Joint Motion Calls for Investigation of Possible Jury Misconduct; Prosecutor, Jury Foreman Make Statements
Calls for Investigation of Possible Jury Misconduct; Prosecutor, Jury Foreman Make Statements
Attorneys for businessman Richard Scrushy and former Alabama Governor Don Siegleman have filed a joint Motion for a New Trial in federal court asking for a court order "vacating their convictions and granting them a new trial...because Defendants were denied their Sixth Amendment right to a fair trial before an impartial jury due to jury exposure to extrinsic evidence and jury misconduct." Also, could an old Scrushy attorney be coming onto this case?More >>
Another Attorney on Scrushy Legal Team
Another Attorney on Scrushy Legal Team
Another attorney has apparently joined Richard Scrushy's legal team. A Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice was filed by Carmen D. Hernandez today in federal court in Montgomery.

More information as it becomes available.More >>
Refiled Scrushy/Siegelman Joint Motion for New Trial Takes No Chances
Refiled Scrushy/Siegelman Joint Motion for New Trial Takes No Chances
The re-filed Scrushy/Siegelman Motion for a New Trial filed just a little while ago in federal court in Montgomery takes no chances with the identity of jurors following a fiasco with the filing earlier in the weekMore >>
First story originally published 5:30 p.m./10-06
Attorneys for Former Governor Siegelman File Emergency Motion to Preserve Evidence
Attorneys for Former Governor Siegelman File Emergency Motion to Preserve Evidence
"Governor Siegelman has a legitimate concern that the companies providing internet, email, cell phone, and/or text messaging services to Jurors B and C ...may, during the ordinary course of business, destroy information critical to the Defendants' prior joint motion..." And the bizarre post-trial world of the government corruption trial saw a couple of more crazy events unfold this week.More >>
Scrushy Defense Files Reply to Government; Reviewing Alabama Supreme Court Opinion
Scrushy Defense Files Reply to Government; Reviewing Alabama Supreme Court Opinion
Attorneys for Richard Scrushy have filed their reply to the governments response to the Scrushy team's Motions for Acquittal. The filing was made shortly after 7 p.m. Friday night and comes in the wake of an Alabama Supreme Court decision Friday that says Richard Scrushy must repay $47.8 million in bonuses he received during the fraud at HealthSouth.More >>
Interview Recorded October 5, 2006
Transcript of Interview with Judge John L. Carroll - Dean, Cumberland Law School
Transcript of Interview with Judge John L. Carroll - Dean, Cumberland Law School
Judge John L. Carroll, Dean of the Cumberland School of Law at Samford University in Birmingham and former United States Magistrate Judge in the Middle District of Alabama for over 14 years discusses the Siegelman/Scrushy joint new trial motion and allegations of jury misconduct and outside information finding its way into jury deliberations with wsfa.com.More >>
Original Story Published 2:58 p.m. - 10/02/2006
Judge Denies Scrushy/Siegelman Motions for Acquittal
Judge Denies Scrushy/Siegelman Motions for Acquittal
Judge Mark Fuller has denied the motions of judgments of acquittal made by former Governor Don Siegelman and Richard Scrushy.More >>
Defense Replies Due in Scrushy/Siegelman Case
Defense Replies Due in Scrushy/Siegelman Case
Replies to the government response to the motions for acquittal filed earlier in August for former Governor Don Siegelman and businessman Richard Scrushy were due no later than midnight August 25, 2006 to the federal court. Scrushy attorney Art Leach gave a generic outline for what to expect and discussed motions, sentencing and the appeals process.More >>
Siegelman Defense Files Reply to Government
Siegelman Defense Files Reply to Government
In the pleading Siegelman's attorney's say, "This case involves very fundamental differences between the Defendants and the government as to the appropriate application of criminal law when individuals and public officials are engaged in traditional political conduct."More >>
Scrushy Attorney Art Leach on Reply to Government, Supreme Court Opinion
Scrushy Attorney Art Leach on Reply to Government, Supreme Court Opinion
"Well I just found it interesting perhaps surprising that the government would take that tact because at trial they didn't raise that issue and all the evidence, which is what we have to rely on is evidence,More >>
Court Says Scrushy Must Pay; Attorney Says Review of Options Underway
Court Says Scrushy Must Pay; Attorney Says
The Alabama Supreme Court Friday affirmed the Jefferson Circuit Court's earlier decision to require former HealthSouth CEO Richard Scrushy to repay $47.8 million in bonuses he received from 1997-2002.More >>

Testimony Nov. 17, 2006 HearingTestimony Nov. 17, 2006 HearingMore>>
Some of the Stated Objections Before the Evidentiary Hearing on Juror Misconduct - Nov 2006
Some of the Stated Objections Before the Evidentiary Hearing on Juror Misconduct - Nov 2006
Kilborn: "...If Your Honor would include in extraneous information any text messaging that they received about the case and not just e-mails, but text messaging. And the last one would be that obviouslyMore >>
Juror 22's Testimony Nov. 17, 2006
Juror 22's Testimony Nov. 17, 2006
Examination of Juror 22 BY THE COURT Good morning. Good morning. (complies) I am going to hand you what has been marked as Court's Exhibit 1, and I know that that has your name on that exhibit. IMore >>
Juror 30's Testimony during Nov. 17th Hearing
Juror 30's Testimony during Nov. 17th Hearing
Juror 30 (Patial, More shortly) Q. During the time that you were serving as a juror did any other juror say or do anything that caused you to believe that he or she may have been exposed to extraneousMore >>
Juror 38's Testimony from Nov. 17th Hearing
Juror 38's Testimony from Nov. 17th Hearing
Juror 38 BY THE COURT Good morning. Let me start off by again thanking you for your appearance today. I have handed you what has been marked as Court's Exhibit 2, and I believe you have already seenMore >>
Juror 66's Testimony from Nov. 17 Hearing
Juror 66's Testimony from Nov. 17 Hearing
Juror 66 (Excerpt taken from official transcript.) Q. Speak into the microphone so that we can hear you if you would, please, Juror Number 66. Did anyone other than another juror try to influence yourMore >>

Testimony and Statements from 10/31/2006 Evidentiary HearingMore>>
Raw Notes from Testimony of Attorney Debra Winston
Raw Notes from Testimony of Attorney Debra Winston
These are raw notes transcribed from paper of Tuesday's hearing. No computers were allowed to be used in the courtroom. This is NOT an official transcript but is provided to give readers a flavor ofMore >>
Raw Notes from Testimony of Juror #5
Raw Notes from Testimony of Juror #5
These are raw notes transcribed from paper of Tuesday's hearing. No computers were allowed to be used in the courtroom. This is NOT an official transcript but is provided to give readers a flavor ofMore >>
Raw Notes from Testimony of Rev. Stephen C. Hudson
Raw Notes from Testimony of Rev. Stephen C. Hudson
These are raw notes transcribed from paper of Tuesday's hearing. No computers were allowed to be used in the courtroom. This is NOT an official transcript but is provided to give readers a flavor ofMore >>
Raw Notes from the Testimony of Rev. Charles Winston
Raw Notes from the Testimony of Rev. Charles Winston
These are raw notes transcribed from paper of Tuesday's hearing. No computers were allowed to be used in the courtroom. This is NOT an official transcript but is provided to give readers a flavor ofMore >>
Raw Notes from the Testimony of Alice Stanford
Raw Notes from the Testimony of Alice Stanford
Alice Stanford lives in Ozark, Alabama and works at the dining facility on Fort Rucker. She has worked for the contractor, InterMark (sp), which runs the facility since December of 2005. She says sheMore >>

Continuing Coverage: Richard Scrushy/Don Siegelman - WSFA.com: News Weather and Sports for Montgomery, AL.

Continuing Coverage: Richard Scrushy/Don Siegelman

Top Headlines

Top HeadlinesMore>>

First on WSFA.com Original filed 9:32 p.m. 05/25

First on WSFA.COM original filed 9:22 p.m. 05/25

WSFA Exclusive

Original story posted 8:54 a.m.

First on WSFA.com, First Reported 10 :00 a.m. 12/13

First on WSFA 12 News: originally posted 10:13 a.m.

Originally Filed 9:27 p.m. Nov. 29, 2006

main update Dec.3, 9 p.m. Original story 8 p.m. Dec. 1, 2006

Continuing Coverage: Richard Scrushy/Don SiegelmanContinuing Coverage: Richard Scrushy/Don SiegelmanMore>>

Original Story 1:54 a.m-12/2/2006

Original Filed 4:42 p.m./12/01/2006

Original story published 3:42 p.m

First Story originally posted 8:30 p.m. - 10/13

Original Story Published 10:11 a.m. - October 11, 2006

Originally filed 5 p.m. 09/25/2006

First story originally published 5:30 p.m./10-06

Interview Recorded October 5, 2006

Original Story Published 2:58 p.m. - 10/02/2006

Testimony Nov. 17, 2006 HearingTestimony Nov. 17, 2006 HearingMore>>